The truth is that, if it were not for knowing the passwords, until not long ago, little could be done to ensure that a family that decided to delete their fingerprint could do so.
In the case of Facebook, after an American woman sued the social media giant for not removing the profile of her brother who died in 2009, a page has been created where relatives can go in the event of a death to request that their profiles, in the name of privacy , be deleted.
In the case of Twitter, in list of azerbaijan consumer email addition to facilitating this process, it also has the added benefit of providing all downloaded tweets to the family so that they can have a copy and a reminder of the thoughts, experiences or events that they decided to share with Internet users. Something similar happens in the case of Tuenti and, little by little, in all social networks .
The truth is that when these tragedies occur, it is difficult to decide whether or not to erase the trace of the person in question.
Is that what you would have wanted? Would you have preferred to leave it there as a form of homage? It seems that it is beginning to be necessary to consider taking a further step, not only on social networks but on any type of forum, blog or website where it is published.
Perhaps, due to the large amount of time that is spent publishing in any online space today, it is necessary to be clear about what could happen in the event of death and that it would be allowed to make a type of digital will in which it would be possible to even leave a space as an inheritance so that another could continue publishing (we could talk about blogs that even generate income), that things would be left as is as a form of memory or, that the necessary procedures would be facilitated to make it possible to erase any digital trace since, for the owner, it would not make sense to continue being part of this new type of collective memory.
